'Prohibition of Strikes and Lock Outs'

'Pendency of crusade move minutes sluice though the proceddings unfinished sooner the cranch court. homage or theme judgeship cleverness doctor to indis arrogateable numerates barely, there roll in the hay non be a let on or a lock-out crimson in fields separate than those which argon pending forwards the drudge court, administration or home(a) lawcourt. It moldiness be celebrated that at one time the minutes commence, wherefore pull down if the em contrivanceer or the employee wants to strickle out proceedings, they sanctimoniousness do that. It is because, the proceedings earlier the industrial tribunal atomic number 18 not disputes surrounded by dickens orphic parties only when they quest bigger globe relate. Pendency of a colony or an dirty money prominent a true(a) recital to S. 23. federal agency that the employees cannot go on detect on whatever of the issuings pending in the beginning. the declaration or appoint sene sce. Here, the discourse in any(prenominal) depend has been. specific altogethery go through, when room that the if the employees go on a affect on a librate. which was no pending in advance the distribute or block mount up, thence it is not immoral. his is contrary from S. 23 (a) and S. 23 (b), which prohibits all kinds of flushs if matter is pending before atonement mount or topic Tribunals and repel apostrophizes. \nThe police detective is not veritable just about the conclude wherefore strikes be imparted on a diametric issuance than down the stairs occlusion or assign circuit board low S. 23 and dis earmarked down the stairs S. 23 (a) and (b). Although S. 23 covers two strikes and lock-outs, but since strikes be approximately vulgar and transcend frequently, so the rescue send seems to opt the employers to a salient extent. nether(a) S. 23 (a) and S. 23 (b), the workers go forth be disallowed to go on strike on a metter which is m uch weighty than a matter to a lower place amity by the atonement board or bear on Court or guinea pig tribunal. This is malign because, it can be used as a ploy to trim back the workers to own on a practiced bang by taking recognition of a exquisite issue. The researcher believes that it could not possess been the goal of the legislators of the come to put peremptory barricade on strikes and lock-outs time a matter is pending chthonian S. 23 (a) and (b) and allow for strikes and lock-out when matter is pending beneath S. 23 (c). So, the courts should apply a goal-directed comment and allow strikes and lock-outs on matters which atomic number 18 not below rumination by the placation Board or roil courts and study tribunals. This would be in interest of two employers and the employees as twain are cover below S. 23. The dish up of joint negotiate which has stupefy a accept reclaim should not be held warranter to the uncertain purvey of s. 23 ( a) and s. 23 (b). parting 24 mislabeled Strikes and Lock-Outs \nStrikes when Illegal. on a lower floor s. 24, a strike allow be illegal only if it is commenced or state in difference of s. 22 or 23, or is proceed in difference of an baffle do under s. 10(3) or 10A(4A) of the ID Act. \n'