Pipeline Politics Taint U.S. War

Pipeline politics taint U.S. war 2002-03-18, Chicago Tribune http:// conditions.chicagotribune.com/2002-03-18/ tidings/0203180046_1_caspian-talib... Outside this country, there is a widespread belief that U.S. forces deployments in Central Asia mostly argon about anoint. An article in the Guardian of London headlined, A pro-western regime in capital of Afghanistan should give the U.S. an Afghan route for Caspian embrocate, foreshadowed the kind of sceptical reporting the U.S. war now receives in many countries. pen George Monbiot ... wrote that the U.S. oil company Unocal Corp. had been negotiating with the Taliban since 1995 to build oil and gas jobs from Turkmenistan, through Afghanistan and into Pakistani ports on the Arabian sea. Unocal pulled out of the deal subsequently the 1998 terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were linked to terrorists based in Afghanistan. The terrorist acts of Sept. 11, though tragic, provided the bush plaque a [ se mblance] to invade Afghanistan, oust the petulant Taliban and, coincidentally, melted the way for the pipeline. To make things even smoother, the U.S.

engineered the rise to forefinger of deuce former Unocal employees: Hamid Karzai, the new interim president of Afghanistan, and Zalmay Khalizad, the Bush administrations Afghanistan envoy. [Uri] Averny, a former member of the Israeli Knesset ... argues that the war on terrorism provides a perfect pretext for the Statess imperial interests. If one looks at the part of the medium-large American bases created for the war, one is struck by the feature that they are co mpletely identical to the route of the proje! cted oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean. No wonder the rest of the gentleman is a bit skeptical about our war on evildoers.If you desire to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay